Timeline for Should we have canonical scam questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 31, 2019 at 20:01 | answer | added | Bryce | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 20, 2019 at 13:19 | answer | added | Grade 'Eh' Bacon | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 15, 2019 at 12:51 | answer | added | Ben Miller | timeline score: 5 | |
Jun 13, 2019 at 20:40 | answer | added | quid | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 13, 2019 at 3:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackFinance/status/1139004744364675075 | ||
Jun 12, 2019 at 15:40 | comment | added | Matthew Read | Maybe instead we could just add a new "Yes" close reason, and just not use in the mythical one-off case. | |
Jun 12, 2019 at 14:36 | comment | added | DJClayworth | The trouble with saying "it's not always scam" is that people will be led to think "Maybe this is the time when it isn't a scam", just like saying "You don't always die if you jump out of a plane without a parachute" might lead people to try it, with similar consequences. | |
Jun 12, 2019 at 14:27 | comment | added | Valorum | I remain certain that on at least one occasion it's turned out to be legit and everyone said it wasn't... | |
Jun 12, 2019 at 11:52 | comment | added | ChatterOne | @Valorum Sure. You also don't always die if you're in a plane crash and fall for 3 km (see Juliane Koepcke ) | |
Jun 12, 2019 at 0:26 | answer | added | JTP - Apologise to MonicaMod | timeline score: 8 | |
Jun 12, 2019 at 0:26 | answer | added | ab2 | timeline score: 12 | |
Jun 11, 2019 at 21:34 | comment | added | DJClayworth | Maybe. But when it is we can close as duplicate of the question that says it is. | |
Jun 11, 2019 at 20:44 | comment | added | Valorum | It's not always a scam. | |
Jun 11, 2019 at 16:48 | comment | added | Ben Miller | Related, possible duplicate: Could we create a common answer to all those “is this a scam?” questions? | |
Jun 11, 2019 at 14:17 | history | asked | DJClayworth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |