I've discovered one of my newly acquired powers is to see the location of a member's IP address. This would conveniently let me add location to a question when appropriate and avoid discussing US-centric solutions to a Non-USian member. It would also save the comment 'country?' that's pretty frequent here.

But. Is it a bit creepy for a new member to see his question tagged with a country when he didn't offer it himself?

  • 3
    What with proxies and other non-technical nonsense, it isn't very trustworthy anyhow.
    – MrChrister
    Commented Apr 15, 2014 at 21:19
  • So you're not in Denver? :) Commented Apr 15, 2014 at 21:34
  • It seems that in a good number of cases the user has a location set in his/her user profile, which is unambiguously public and also probably more reliable since the user put the info there themselves.
    – BrenBarn
    Commented Apr 25, 2014 at 20:38
  • @BrenBarn - agreed. I just see "please add country tag" far more than I'd like. And I do check profile before asking. Commented Apr 25, 2014 at 21:04

2 Answers 2


The ability to see IP addresses is meant for moderation purposes, not for anything else. Adding the location of the user based on this moderator-only information could be seen as a violation of the moderator agreement as you're indirectly disclosing PII to all other users.

In short, this is problematic at least and might even be a violation of the moderator agreement and the SE privacy policy.

  • 1
    Understood. No problem. I will continue to prompt users to add a country when appropriate. Commented Apr 15, 2014 at 20:36
  • Potential violation of SE Privacy Policy and Moderator Agreement? Yeah. Country information alone as "PII"? Nope. You're 50% right in your reasoning, but 100% right in your response
    – Noah
    Commented May 6, 2014 at 19:57
  • @Noah The IP address is PII, at least in some countries (like Germany where I'm from). My own rule as a moderator is that information derived from PII is something I shouldn't reveal as well. The legal situation is certainly much more complicated, and I'm not qualified to comment on it.
    – user14527
    Commented May 6, 2014 at 20:22

Aside from the previously noted privacy concerns, which are probably valid, it's not necessarily the correct jurisdiction. Some proportion of questions are hypothetical, future-oriented, past-oriented, or asked while in a different jurisdiction or on behalf of remote acquaintances. So the assumption based on the asker's IP will be incorrect some small but noticeable number of times.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .