I've discovered one of my newly acquired powers is to see the location of a member's IP address. This would conveniently let me add location to a question when appropriate and avoid discussing US-centric solutions to a Non-USian member. It would also save the comment 'country?' that's pretty frequent here.

But. Is it a bit creepy for a new member to see his question tagged with a country when he didn't offer it himself?

  • 3
    What with proxies and other non-technical nonsense, it isn't very trustworthy anyhow.
    – MrChrister
    Apr 15 '14 at 21:19
  • So you're not in Denver? :) Apr 15 '14 at 21:34
  • It seems that in a good number of cases the user has a location set in his/her user profile, which is unambiguously public and also probably more reliable since the user put the info there themselves.
    – BrenBarn
    Apr 25 '14 at 20:38
  • @BrenBarn - agreed. I just see "please add country tag" far more than I'd like. And I do check profile before asking. Apr 25 '14 at 21:04

The ability to see IP addresses is meant for moderation purposes, not for anything else. Adding the location of the user based on this moderator-only information could be seen as a violation of the moderator agreement as you're indirectly disclosing PII to all other users.

In short, this is problematic at least and might even be a violation of the moderator agreement and the SE privacy policy.

  • 1
    Understood. No problem. I will continue to prompt users to add a country when appropriate. Apr 15 '14 at 20:36
  • Potential violation of SE Privacy Policy and Moderator Agreement? Yeah. Country information alone as "PII"? Nope. You're 50% right in your reasoning, but 100% right in your response
    – Noah
    May 6 '14 at 19:57
  • @Noah The IP address is PII, at least in some countries (like Germany where I'm from). My own rule as a moderator is that information derived from PII is something I shouldn't reveal as well. The legal situation is certainly much more complicated, and I'm not qualified to comment on it.
    – user14527
    May 6 '14 at 20:22

Aside from the previously noted privacy concerns, which are probably valid, it's not necessarily the correct jurisdiction. Some proportion of questions are hypothetical, future-oriented, past-oriented, or asked while in a different jurisdiction or on behalf of remote acquaintances. So the assumption based on the asker's IP will be incorrect some small but noticeable number of times.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .