There is an tag . I see few question tagged with this. We already have a very popular tag .

We already have a plural generic tag and it doesn't make sense to have additional tag

2 Answers 2


I think we should merge them. Seems pretty clear-cut.

As it's hard to reverse afterwards I'll leave it a couple of days before doing that.

EDIT: now done.


has 19 questions vs 1649 for . I don't see the need for the former.

I'll agree with Ganesh, it's good practice to give these things a few days for member input. Although, Meta doesn't get as much activity as we'd like.

Update - Done.

  • 1
    I think it's unlikely that you're going to get any push-back on a merge this time. The case for this one is stronger than my investing/investment suggestion. Commented Jul 13, 2017 at 17:38
  • @NathanL Just for fun, I was trying to think of any argument against the merge, and I couldn't.
    – TTT
    Commented Aug 4, 2017 at 23:52
  • @TTT - And as members requested, with no objection from me, I gave it nearly a week before doing anything I couldn't undo. Commented Aug 5, 2017 at 0:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .