This is the privilege list (communications) for our Stack:

enter image description here

The issue I am opening for feedback is whether we want to lobby for a higher level required to comment. Put a different way - "Do we feel that very new members are using comment inappropriately, or are they giving us reason to want to raise the threshold?"

In this case, the Money.SE mods do not have the power to do this, it has to be done at a higher level. We would need strong member support, and a number of examples of comment threads that we would have avoided. Please provide those examples in the answers.

  • What types of problem comments are you concerned about?
    – Ben Miller
    Commented Aug 10, 2017 at 15:03
  • The request for this proposal came from another member, and protocol suggested that I circulate it for comment. Commented Aug 10, 2017 at 16:18

5 Answers 5


I would find having a site-specific requirement for such a basic privilege confusing and irritating. (Not that the misuse of comments isn't irritating...) Note that unlike many other privileges (edit, vote to close), commenting is set at 50 reputation for both graduated and beta sites.

Money is not in such a bad shape comment-wise; as far as I can tell, The Workplace and RPG sites have a bigger problem with comments turning into mini-forums. The Workplace has a custom setting: Comments without upvotes are now hidden if a question has more than two answers. This may be a more practical solution than a custom level of reputation.

But probably, a network-wide solution is called for: one proposal currently under discussion is to rename "add a comment" link.

  • 2
    You have no questions or answer at Money.SE, I find your participation here (at Meta) interesting. I do appreciate the answer, as it's well reasoned, and offers a choice I didn't know we had (the 'hide' feature). I hope to see you at the main site! Thanks, Michelle! Commented Aug 9, 2017 at 15:28

Specifically on this site I haven't seen abuse of comments. There are some that have attracted more comments.

What I have seen is that quite a few new users even with the low threshold need to make some valid comment, end up posting an answer ... this then gets flagged to be converted into comment.

In my view an alternate view is we build a delete option for comment which is currently restricted to Mods to wider users based on reputation. This would mean that it is more clean and ideally put up comments via review tasks.


No, I am not in favor of increasing the rep required to comment.

First, I agree with Michelle that there should not be different rep/privilege levels on each site. It should be a network standard.

Second, as someone with the network-wide bonus privilege, I enjoy being able to comment on other sites where I don't have a lot of rep yet. I'm not willing to give that up.

Spam is non-existent in the comments the way it is. Almost all spammers have a rep level of "1", so this would be the case even if we lowered the threshold.

It is true that there are a few people that abuse the comment space. But if we raise the comment rep requirement to 75 or 100, would this really stop them? If they are able to earn 50 rep, they will probably be able to earn 100 without too much difficulty. I don't want to punish new users that are trying to learn in good faith to be valuable contributors to the site.

Instead, I like the proposals that call for comments being able to be downvoted. I'd like to see some rep loss for each comment downvote received, and an automatic delete of any comment that reaches a low score, maybe -5. That would help the mods police the comments a little, and dis-incentivize the posting of bad comments.

  • 1
    I agree with the proposal to allow downvoting of comments as solution to this issue. In my mind our problem with comments is not that we get too many long comments, but that comments by the uninformed detract from and undermine good answers. Downvoting is a better solution because some bad commenters have a high reputation.
    – farnsy
    Commented Oct 9, 2017 at 19:39
  • That already kind of works like that with flagging, too many flags will see a comment deleted with no mod intervention necessary. Even 1 flag will do it if the comment contains certain rude words. Commented Oct 16, 2017 at 21:14

I'd be strongly against this. We already have an intermittent issue of "I posted this comment as an answer because I don't have enough rep to comment" issues. This would make it worse.

  • 1
    Much thanks for this feedback. Excellent points. Commented Aug 11, 2017 at 19:27
  • At least bad answers can receive downvotes.
    – quid
    Commented Aug 13, 2017 at 17:46
  • I'm generally fairly aggressive with answers that should be comments, unless they're really good comments I just delete them rather than converting to comments. Commented Aug 19, 2017 at 10:22

I think Michelle's answer is excellent, and I joined the global meta to upvote the suggestion to rename the "add a comment" link. Also, I think the suggestion in Michelle's answer to hide comments when some criteria is met is excellent because I think there's a piling on effect once an answer gets a couple of comments.

Interestingly, joining the global meta reminded me of my issue:

enter image description here

I think comments are somewhat specific to the topic at hand and don't necessarily agree that participation in another stack necessarily indicates a user's understanding of the rules sufficient to start commenting on every topic. I think we get a lot of low participation comments for a couple of reasons:

  • The immediate points bump in excess of the comments threshold (but not the downvote threshold) for participation on other stacks
    • The fact that you can comment but not downvote leads relatively new users to comment negatively because they can't downvote
  • The lack of a downvote feature for comments
  • The inability of a question or answer author to remove a comment that's been addressed

enter image description here

I'm sure a lot of people thought a lot about the arrangement of this list. I think that if there is a method for punishing bad answers, there needs to be a method for punishing bad comments. And, I may speak for myself here, I'd rather get downvotes than a comments expressing the commenter's opinion rather than to suggest a specific improvement.

A comment, by the stack exchange definition, is meant to address the author of the question or answer. I almost think a solution is not a rep level required to leave a comment, but a rep level required to see a comment. Either you wrote the question or answer and the comment is pertinent to what you wrote, or you're of sufficient rep to participate in moderating/editing questions and answers. This obviously leaves the possibility that multiple comments with the same suggestion will be left but to some extent I think the fact that comments are public invites opinionated comments rather than useful ones, then the opinionated comments invite further comments and a discussion. I think if comments were primarily invisible or visible only to those who could actually affect the edit suggested there would be no point to leaving a comment of opinion.

Ultimately if comments must be public, I think the core of the problem is that comments are "free." There's no "bad comment" stick the way there's a "bad question/answer" stick, I'll never lose my precious rep points for continuously posting useless comments.

  • If you want to remove a comment that's been addressed, just flag it as "no longer needed". I'm happy to clean up comment threads when they're brought to my attention. Commented Aug 10, 2017 at 6:01
  • Agreed. We do get flags on obsolete comments, and the team responds pretty well to these. Commented Aug 11, 2017 at 19:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .