Timeline for Technical analysis off/on topic? Text to include
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 3, 2016 at 10:50 | comment | added | mhoran_psprep | For the technical analysis butter want to add ...( again excluding specific recommendations and evaluation of conditions) . We want to avoid questions that are entirely pasting of a chart and asking "is it time to sell?" | |
Sep 27, 2016 at 21:17 | history | edited | Chris W. Rea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
Sep 27, 2016 at 14:40 | comment | added | dg99 | @ChrisW.Rea Yes, good call. | |
Sep 27, 2016 at 13:21 | comment | added | JTP - Apologise to Monica Mod | Thanks. It looks fine to me, I just don't want to ever touch On Topic without waiting and getting more member input. Especially since this is a topic I don't really follow. (I did add 'insurance', but that wasn't even close to controversy, it seemed am oversight it wasn't listed) | |
Sep 27, 2016 at 13:18 | comment | added | Chris W. Rea | @JoeTaxpayer I completely agree. (Also why I marked it a wiki. Feel free to edit.) | |
Sep 27, 2016 at 4:46 | comment | added | JTP - Apologise to Monica Mod | Nice answer. Given that this is soliciting an update to the on-topic wording, I'd like to see more responses, or comments on this answer. Or at least my fellow mod's agreement as well. The topic hasn't been explicitly added to the page in over 6 years, another week or two is no issue. | |
Sep 27, 2016 at 1:46 | history | edited | Chris W. Rea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
Sep 26, 2016 at 23:26 | comment | added | Chris W. Rea | @dg99 "Securities", then? | |
Sep 26, 2016 at 19:52 | comment | added | dg99 | "Stock" should probably be something more broad, such as "financial" or "financial instrument" or "exchange product". | |
S Sep 25, 2016 at 14:22 | history | answered | Chris W. Rea | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
S Sep 25, 2016 at 14:22 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Chris W. Rea |